Abstract

Aerated wetland (AW) technology is typically used in high oxygen demand situations. This study however investigated its applicability for further polishing of effluents of both a municipal and an industrial wastewater treatment plant. Different aeration and pollutant removal strategies were tested, all under high hydraulic loading rate conditions (0.69 m3.m−2.d−1, 12h hydraulic retention time). The experiments were done on two 350 m² horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSSF CW), filled with expanded clay aggregates (Argex™) and planted with common reed (Phragmites australis). Each CW was divided into three equal zones, each equipped with forced bed aeration (FBA™). For this study, continuous (100% on) and time-based (50%-time on/off) aeration were compared versus set dissolved oxygen levels controlled by oxygen sensors (3–4, 2–3 and 1–2 mgO2. L−1 in each zone, and 2–3 mgO2. L−1 in zone 1 and no aeration in zones 2 and 3, designated as 2–3/0/0). Results showed near 100% nitrification for all aeration regimes. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was between 18% and 33% during high aeration (100%, 50%, 3–4 and 2–3 mgO2. L−1) but was reduced (1–15%) during the most limiting aeration modes (1–2 and 2–3/0/0 mgO2. L−1). Denitrification was limited for municipal effluent, however, reasonable NO3-N removal (31–72%) was noted for industrial effluent. The optimal balance between removal efficiency and energy consumption was found to be for the 2–3 mgO2. L−1 aeration setting, consuming 6.9–11.2 Wh.m−3. The outcomes of this study can be helpful for implementing aerated CWs as a tertiary treatment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call