Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with upper extremity impairments presenting significant rehabilitation challenges. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) has emerged as a potential intervention for enhancing upper limb functionality, but its efficacy compared to traditional therapy methods requires further exploration. Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CIMT versus traditional therapy in improving upper extremity function among stroke survivors. Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, 58 stroke patients from Aziz Fatima and Allied Hospital in Faisalabad were recruited and allocated to either the CIMT group (n=29) or the traditional therapy group (n=29). Eligible participants were those aged 30-50 years with ischemic or infarctive stroke and impaired use of their hemiparetic arm. The CIMT group received standard treatment plus CIMT, while the traditional group received only standard treatment, including manual therapy and TENS, for 8 weeks. Pre- and post-treatment assessments utilized the Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log (UEMAL) scales. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25, employing independent t-tests. Results: The CIMT group showed a significant improvement in the UEMAL Amount Scale (pre-treatment: 1.64 ± 0.51, post-treatment: 3.04 ± 0.75; p=0.000) and the UEMAL How Well Scale (pre-treatment: 2.28 ± 0.57, post-treatment: 3.81 ± 0.55; p=0.000). The traditional therapy group also demonstrated gains but to a lesser extent (UEMAL Amount Scale pre-treatment: 1.08 ± 0.24, post-treatment: 1.69 ± 0.33; UEMAL How Well Scale pre-treatment: 1.47 ± 0.30, post-treatment: 2.11 ± 0.40; p=0.000 for both). Conclusion: CIMT provided significant functional improvements in upper extremity motor activity compared to traditional therapy, suggesting that CIMT may be a more effective approach for post-stroke rehabilitation of the upper limb.