Abstract
We evaluated how climate influences interannual variability in the terrestrial Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) of CO2 using the Simple Biosphere Model, Version 2 (SiB2) for 1983 to 1993 on a global, 1° by 1° latitude/longitude grid with a 10‐min time step. We quantified climate influences on NEE, explained regional differences, and related NEE variability to the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The simulated NEE reproduces the salient features and magnitude of the measured global CO2 growth rate. The Northern Hemisphere shows a pattern of alternating positive and negative NEE anomalies that cancel such that the tropics dominate the global simulated NEE interannual variability. Climate influences have strong regional differences with precipitation dominating in the tropics and temperature in the extratropics. In tropical regions with drier soils, precipitation control of photosynthesis (i.e., drought stress) dominates; in nearly saturated soils, precipitation control of respiration dominates. Because of cancellation and competing effects, no single climate variable controls global or regional NEE interannual variability. Globally, precipitation accounts for 44% of NEE variability; followed by Leaf Area Index (23%), soil carbon (12%), and temperature (16%). The influence of ENSO on NEE variability is consistent with that expected for shifting precipitation patterns in the tropics. Except in northern Europe, temperature advection by the AO does not significantly influence NEE variability. Neither the AO nor ENSO fully explain the temperature influence on respiration or the simulated NEE anomaly pattern in the Northern Hemisphere.
Highlights
[2] The measured atmospheric CO2 growth rate is only about half that expected based on fossil fuel emissions
We use the process information in the model to quantify how each climate variable influences the interannual variability of terrestrial CO2 fluxes and explain regional and ecosystem differences
Recent research emphasizes what factors most influence the interannual variability of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) [Los et al, 2001] and terrestrial CO2 fluxes [Kaduk and Heimann, 1997; Potter and Klooster, 1999]
Summary
[2] The measured atmospheric CO2 growth rate is only about half that expected based on fossil fuel emissions. The global, atmospheric CO2 growth rate shows a great deal of interannual variability [Conway et al, 1994; Lloyd, 1999; Rayner and Law, 1999; Tans and Wallace, 1999; Bousquet et al, 2000; Fung, 2000]. Biogeochemistry models track the amount of carbon in various biological pools [e.g., Ichii et al, 2001], but vary widely in the number of pools and how explicitly they represent photosynthesis and respiration processes Many of these suggest temperature and precipitation have the most influence on interannual variability, but disagree on the exact mechanism [e.g., Kaduk and Heimann, 1997; LLoyd, 1999; Dickinson, 2000; Houghton, 2000]. We quantify how interannual climate variability affects terrestrial CO2 fluxes and relate the results to known climatic phenomena
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
