Effect of central venous catheter type on infections: a prospective clinical trial

Abstract

This study reports on a block clinical trial of two types of central venous catheters (CVCs): antiseptic-impregnated catheters (AIC) and non-impregnated catheters (non-AIC), on catheter tip colonization and bacteraemia. In total, 500 catheters were inserted in 390 patients over the 18 month study period, 260 (52.0%) AIC and 240 (48.0%) non-AIC. Of these, 460 (92.0%) tips (237 AIC and 223 non-AIC) were collected. While significantly fewer AIC, 14 (5.9%), than non-AIC, 30 (13.5%), catheters were colonized ( P<0.01), there was no difference in the rates of bacteraemias in the two groups (0.8% vs. 2.7%, respectively, P=0.16). There were 6.87 (95% CI 3.38–14.26) and 16.92 (95% CI 10.61–27.12) colonized AIC and non-AIC catheters, respectively, per 1000 catheter days, a difference that was significant ( P<0.01). However, no difference emerged between bacteraemias in AIC and non-AIC catheters per 1000 catheter days measured at 0.98 (95% CI 0.24–5.54) and 3.38 (95% CI 1.29–9.34), respectively ( P=0.10). Of the 444 CVCs that were sited in the subclavian or jugular veins and had tips collected, significantly more catheters were colonized in the jugular group, 19 (20%), compared with the subclavian group, 24 (6.9%; P≤0.01). Overall, the low rates of colonization and bacteraemia may be explained by the population studied, the policies used and the employment of a clinical nurse dedicated to CVC management.