Abstract

To compare the difference in mandibular canal (MC) visibility using three different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition protocols: high resolution (HR), standard resolution (ST) and Quick scan+ (QS+). Twenty-five human dry mandibles were scanned by one CBCT machine; i-CAT FLX (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA), using three different acquisition protocols: high-resolution (HR), standard (ST) and Quick scan+ (QS+). DICOM data were transferred to a third party software Ondemand 3D (Cybermed Co., Seoul, Korea). The fusion module was used to superimpose images derived from different acquisition protocols to standardize the areas to compare the MC visibility. Comparison was performed at nine selected cross sections extending from an area distal to the third molar posteriorly to the first premolar anteriorly. Two expert radiologists evaluated the degree of MC visibility using five-scale scoring system. There was a statistically significant difference between the three acquisition protocols (HR, ST, QS+) at all investigated areas regardless of dentition status (p value < 0.001-0.034) except at the MR1M area where there was no statistically significant difference (p value = 0.094). HR protocol showed the highest prevalence of fully and partially corticated MCat almost all investigated areas while QS+ protocol showed the highest prevalence of invisible MC and clear and unclear non-corticated MC at almost all investigated areas. QS+ protocol of i-CAT FLX CBCT machine is a recommended low-dose CBCT acquisition protocol for MC visibility at dentulous posterior mandibular regions while ST protocol is recommended at edentulous areas.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call