Abstract
The role of different types of caustics in bitumen extraction from Canadian oil sands is investigated by analyzing their effect on subprocesses involved in bitumen extraction. Both sodium hydroxide and ammonium hydroxide were shown to improve bitumen liberation, which is favorable for bitumen recovery, but increased induction time of bitumen–bubble attachment, which is harmful for bitumen recovery. Although a similar performance was observed at pH of ∼8.5, at pH 11.3, the use of ammonium hydroxide led to a shorter induction time of bitumen–bubble attachment and, hence, better bitumen recovery than the use of sodium hydroxide to achieve the same slurry pH. The better performance of ammonium hydroxide is attributed to a more hydrophobic surface and a less negative zeta potential of bitumen in the process water because of the release of less amount of natural surfactants in ammonium hydroxide solutions than in sodium hydroxide solutions of the same solution pH. Overall, ammonium hydroxide was found to be a suitable replacement for sodium hydroxide. Although this study was mainly concerned with mining–extraction operations, the major findings derived from this study could be applied readily to in situ thermal bitumen production operations, because ammonia can be delivered with steam to oil sands formations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
