Abstract

Scientific evidence pertaining to the evaluation of trueness of occlusal splints fabricated using different three-dimensional (3D) printers and build orientations compared to subtractive technologies is lacking. Overall, one hundred and ten occlusal splints were manufactured using two different 3D printers and a dental mill. Five groups of ten were fabricated using the 3D printers at different build orientations (0, 30, 45, 60, and 90 degrees). In addition, a comparison group of ten occlusal splints was subtractively manufactured using a five-axis dental mill. All occlusal splints were scanned and exported as a standard tessellation language file. Analysis was conducted with metrology software with root mean square estimate average positive deviation and average negative deviation used as the measured outcome. The 0 degree printing orientation was the most accurate for printer one with the root mean square value of 0.05 ± 0.01 mm, and 60 degree printing orientation was most accurate for printer two with the RMS value of 0.11 ± 0.01 mm. Subtractively manufactured occlusal splint had significantly higher trueness with the lowest RMS value of 0.03 ± 0.05 mm. Build orientations influence the trueness of additively manufactured occlusal splints while occlusal splints produced by subtractive manufacturing were statistically significantly more accurate.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call