Effect of bone trauma therapeutic instrument combined with Guyuling capsule on traumatic fracture

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of bone trauma therapy instrument combined with Guyuling capsule in the treatment of traumatic fractures and the effects on the levels of serum epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor-1 (TGF-β1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Methods The clinical data of 168 patients with traumatic fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into the bone trauma treatment instrument group (54 cases), the bone Guyuling capsule group (52 cases) and the combined group (62 cases). All patients were treated with open internal fixation and routine anti-infection, detumescence, analgesic and other symptomatic treatment. The bone trauma therapeutic instrument group was given auxiliary treatment with bone trauma therapeutic instrument on the basis of conventional treatment, the bone healing capsule group was added with bone healing capsule treatment on the basis of conventional treatment, and the bone trauma therapeutic instrument and bone healing capsule combined treatment were given in the combined group at the same time. The clinical efficacy was compared and the serum levels of EGF, TGF-β1 and VEGF in the three groups were detected. Results The detumescence time (8.37 ± 2.84 d vs. 10.76 ± 4.17 d, 11.64 ± 3.98 d, F=12.329) and the healing time (11.73 ± 3.44 week vs. 14.23 ± 4.62 week, 14.76 ± 5.17 week, F=7.835) of the combined group were significantly shorter than those of the bone trauma therapy group and the Guyuling capsule group (P<0.01). After treatment, the serum EGF (0.60 ± 0.27 μg/L vs. 0.75 ± 0.35 μg/L, 0.72 ± 0.37 μg/L, F=3.406), TGF-β1 (9.28 ± 4.19 μg/L vs. 12.36 ± 4.21 μg/L, 12.86 ± 4.69 µg/L, F=11.568), VEGF (92.58 ± 26.01 pg/ml vs. 132.69 ± 28.01 pg/ml, 127.63 ± 29.85 pg/ml, F=36.053) were significantly lower than those in the bone trauma therapy group and the Guyuling capsule group (P<0.01). Three months after operation, the cure rate was 35.2% (19/54) and the total effective rate was 81.5% (44/54) in all three groups. The cure rate and total effective rate in the combined group were better than those in the bone trauma therapy group and the Guyuling capsule group (χ2=6.373, 4.669, P=0.041, 0.031). Conclusions The treatment of traumatic fractures with bone trauma therapy instrument combined with Guyuling capsule can promote the healing of fractures, reduce the stress response caused by fractures, and improve the clinical efficacy. Key words: Fractures, closed; Fracture fixation, internal; Guyuling capsule; Bone trauma therapy apparatus; Vascular endothelial growth factors