Abstract
To determine whether reduced tissue oxygen availability through blood flow restriction (BFR) alone, or in combination with electrically induced muscle contractions, can improve glucose clearance after an acute glucose challenge. In a randomized crossover design, 21 young participants (females: 12) were allocated to perform 1) electrical muscle stimulation (EMS), 2) BFR, 3) EMS + BFR or 4) no treatment (control). Participants completed each condition immediately preceding a 2h oral glucose tolerance test (100g). Primary analyses were performed on the glucose area under the curve (AUC) at time points 0-30, 30-120, and 0-120min. Secondary analyses were performed on glycemic responses based on biological sex and estimated muscle phenotype. Compared to the control (322±25mM∙min), the 0-30min AUC was reduced following EMS (293±22mM∙min, p = 0.0004), and EMS + BFR (298±36mM∙min., p = 0.006), whereas BFR in isolation did not differ (306±30mM∙min, p = 0.1). The 30-120 and 0-120min glucose AUCs were similar across conditions. Based on effect size from the control conditions, our secondary analysis suggests different 0-30min glycemic responses after EMS + BFR between females (dz = 0.206) vs. males (dz = 1.461) and/or slow (dz = 0.426) vs. fast (dz = 1.075) muscle phenotype. Reducing tissue oxygen availability with BFR did not augment the effects of EMS in the overall group; however, we provide preliminary data to suggest possible sex and/or muscle phenotypic responses in glycemic regulation with these modalities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.