Abstract

BackgroundHigh-quality single blastocyst transfer (SBT) is increasingly recommended to patients because of its acceptable pregnancy outcomes and significantly reduced multiple pregnancy rate compared to double blastocyst transfer (DBT). However, there is no consensus on whether this transfer strategy is also suitable for poor-quality blastocysts. Moreover, the effect of the development speed of poor-quality blastocysts on pregnancy outcomes has been controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the effects of blastocyst development speed and morphology on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes during the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle of poor-quality blastocysts and to ultimately provide references for clinical transfer strategies.MethodsA total of 2,038 FET cycles of poor-quality blastocysts from patients 40 years old or less were included from January 2014 to December 2019 and divided based on the blastocyst development speed and number of embryos transferred: the D5-SBT (n = 476), D5-DBT (n = 365), D6-SBT (n = 730), and D6-DBT (n = 467) groups. The SBT group was further divided based on embryo morphology: D5-AC/BC (n = 407), D5-CA/CB (n = 69), D6-AC/BC (n = 580), and D6-CA /CB (n = 150).ResultsWhen blastocysts reach the same development speed, the live birth and multiple pregnancy rates of DBT were significantly higher than those of SBT. Moreover, there was no statistical difference in the rates of early miscarriage and live birth between the AC/BC and CA/CB groups. When patients in the SBT group were stratified by blastocyst development speed, the rates of clinical pregnancy (42.44 % vs. 20.82 %) and live birth (32.35 % vs. 14.25 %) of D5-SBT group were significantly higher than those of D6-SBT group. Furthermore, for blastocysts in the same morphology group (AC/BC or CA/CA group), the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth in the D5 group were also significantly higher than those of D6 group.ConclusionsFor poor-quality D5 blastocysts, SBT can be recommended to patients because of acceptable pregnancy outcomes and significantly reduced multiple pregnancy rate compared with DBT. For poor-quality D6, the DBT strategy is recommended to patients to improve pregnancy outcomes. When blastocysts reach the same development speed, the transfer strategy of selecting blastocyst with inner cell mass “C” or blastocyst with trophectoderm “C” does not affect the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Highlights

  • The in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF-ET) technology is widely used worldwide and benefits many couples with infertility

  • For poor-quality D5 blastocysts, single blastocyst transfer (SBT) can be recommended to patients because of acceptable pregnancy outcomes and significantly reduced multiple pregnancy rate compared with double blastocyst transfer (DBT)

  • When blastocysts reached the same development speed, there were no statistical differences between the SBT and DBT groups in patients’ age, body mass index (BMI), anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), infertility duration, proportion of endometrial preparation program, endometrial thickness, and rates of implantation, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF-ET) technology is widely used worldwide and benefits many couples with infertility. Employing the strategy of single embryo transfer is an effective measure to minimize the incidence of multiple pregnancy for infertile patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Single high-quality blastocyst transfer yields an acceptable pregnancy outcome compared to double blastocyst transfer (DBT) and significantly reduces the incidence of multiple pregnancy [5,6,7]. High-quality single blastocyst transfer (SBT) is increasingly recommended to patients because of its acceptable pregnancy outcomes and significantly reduced multiple pregnancy rate compared to double blastocyst transfer (DBT). This study aimed to explore the effects of blastocyst development speed and morphology on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes during the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle of poor-quality blastocysts and to provide references for clinical transfer strategies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call