Abstract

A two-year study (harvest years 2019 and 2020) was conducted to investigate the effect of a commercially available biofertilizer, in combination with variable nitrogen (N) rate, on bread baking quality and agronomic traits in hard winter wheat grown in conventional (CONV) and organic (ORG) farming systems in Kentucky, USA. The hard red winter wheat cultivar ‘Vision 45’ was used with three N rates (44, 89.6 and 134.5 kg/ha as Low, Med and High, respectively) and three biofertilizer spray regimes (no spray, one spray and two sprays). All traits measured were significantly affected by the agricultural production system (CONV or ORG) and N rate, although trends in their interactions were inconsistent between years. In Y2, yield was greatest in treatments with high N rates and in the ORG system. Biofertilizer treatments had a negative to neutral effect on grain yield. Baking quality traits such as protein content, lactic acid solvent retention capacity and sedimentation value (SV) were consistently greater in the CONV system and increased with the higher N application rates. Similarly, biofertilizer application had no effect on predictive baking quality traits, except for SV in year 1 of the study, where it increased with two sprays. Loaf volume was consistently greater from wheat grown in CONV treatments. From these results, we conclude that further research is warranted to evaluate the potential for biofertilizers to enhance N uptake and affect bread baking quality or other end-use traits. Additional research may be especially useful in organic production systems where biologically based N fertilizers are utilized, and treatments were not negatively affected by biofertilizer applications. Such strategies may be needed to increase protein quantity and gluten quality to optimize winter wheat production for bread baking qualities in the southeastern USA.

Highlights

  • Hard red winter (HRW) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) makes up approximately 40% of the total wheat cultivated in the US [1]

  • Plants were consistently taller in the CONV treatments than in the ORG Med N and Low N, they did not differ from the ORG High N treatment (Table 2)

  • SRC has been shown to be positively correlated with loaf volume [30], which is consistent with the results reported with treatments in the CONV system reporting greater

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hard red winter (HRW) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) makes up approximately 40% of the total wheat cultivated in the US [1]. HRW is mostly grown in the Great Plains region, which is characterized by dry sub-humid and semi-arid weather conditions [2]. HRW grain has a high protein content that results in flour typically used for bread production. It has a lower yield potential [3] than soft red winter (SRW) wheat. SRW is widely adapted to grow in high-rainfall, moist, sub-humid regions such as the eastern US and typically produces higher-yielding but lower protein content flour than HRW. Due to the low protein content, SRW flour is not generally used for bread baking [4], but it is best suited to the production of cakes, pastries, crackers, and cookies [5]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call