Abstract

Capital adequacy implies the conventional assessment of the minimal level of capital, according to certain parameters, which reflect the dimension of banking activity and of related risks, capable to provide a correlation between the supposed obtained benefits and potential loss caused by a certain risk level. Since Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) is the ratio that is set by the regulatory authority in the banking sector, and this ratio can be used to test the health of the banking system. Thus, this study examines the effect of bank specific (Bank Size ,Deposit to Asset Ratio, Loan to Asset Ratio, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Return on Asset, Return on Equity ,Loan Loss Provision) and macroeconomic determinants (Gross Domestic Product and Inflation) on capital adequacy ratio of Ethiopian Private Commercial Banks. In order to investigate these issues a quantitative method research approach is utilized, by using documentary analysis. More specifically, the study uses five years (2016 – 2020) data for fourteen private commercial banks in Ethiopia. The study used multiple linear regression models to determine the relative importance of each independent variable using OLS to estimate the relationship between CAR its determinants by STATA 13 econometric software. The findings show that bank size, return on equity ,loan to asset ratio affect capital adequacy ratio negatively whereas return on asset ,loan loss provision affect capital adequacy ratio positively .Hence , it is recommended that to be sure that to be sure that bank have adequate adequacy reserve ,commercial bank and national bank of Ethiopia should give attention to the risk associated with bank size ,caring bank loan and deposit initiating to increase their return on their return on their asset and to manage their equity return. Keywords: Capital adequacy ratio, Ethiopian Private Commercial Banks, Panel data analysis DOI: 10.7176/RJFA/11-21-01 Publication date: November 30 th 2020

Highlights

  • Capital adequacy as a concept has been in existence prior to the era of capital regulation in the bankingindustry and there exist several literatures on the determination of capital adequacy ratio (CAR) as well as its determinants

  • Capital adequacy implies the conventional assessment of the minimal level of capital, according to certain parameters, which reflect the dimension of banking activity and of related risks, capable to provide a correlation between the supposed obtained benefits and potential loss caused by a certain risk level

  • The findings show that bank size, return on equity,loan to asset ratio affect capital adequacy ratio negatively whereas return on asset,loan loss provision affect capital adequacy ratio positively . , it is recommended that to be sure that to be sure that bank have adequate adequacy reserve,commercial bank and national bank of Ethiopia should give attention to the risk associated with bank size,caring bank loan and deposit initiating to increase their return on their return on their asset and to manage their equity return

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Capital adequacy as a concept has been in existence prior to the era of capital regulation in the bankingindustry and there exist several literatures on the determination of capital adequacy ratio (CAR) as well as its determinants. In light of the above facts and the research gaps, the aim of this study is to examine bank specific and macroeconomic determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio of Private commercial banks in Ethiopia. To this end, this study tried to provide real information about the determinant factors affecting CAR of private commercial banks. III.Objective of the study The general objective of this study is to examine the effect of bank specific and macroeconomic determinants on capital adequacy ratio of Ethiopian Private Commercial Banks. This paper examined and tests whether the following nine variables are not significantly affect Capital Adequacy Ratio or not These hypotheses include: Ho 1: Bank Size negatively affects CAR.

LITERATURE REVIEW
DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Findings
VIII. Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call