Abstract

Even though the two-dosemeter approach successfully solved the underestimation problem of the single-dosemeter approach for posterior incident radiations, this approach significantly overestimates effective dose for the lateral and overhead beam directions when isotropic-responding dosemeters are used for measurement. This kind of overestimation can be reduced by using anisotropic-responding dosemeters whose responses decrease as the incident angle increases, i.e. from 0 degree (normal incidence) to 90 degrees (lateral incidence). To quantify the reduction of overestimation by using anisotropic-responding dosemeters, this study applied the two-dosemeter approach to several types of anisotropic-responding dosemeters--both ideal and commercial--and then compared the results with those of isotropic-responding dosemeters. This study also derived a set of angular response factors (ARF) which can be used to develop a personal dosemeter with ideal angular response properties for use in the two-dosemeter approach.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.