Abstract
The influence of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on other-cause of mortality (OCM) was investigated in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with modern high-dose radiotherapy. A retrospective review was conducted on 1125 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiotherapy, including image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy or brachytherapy with a median follow-up of 80.7 months. Overall survival rate was no different between ADT (+) and ADT (−) group in high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. OCM was found in 71 patients, consisting of 4% (10/258) in the ADT (−) group and 7% (61/858) in the ADT (+) group (p = 0.0422). The 10-year OCM-free survival rate (OCMFS), if divided by the duration of ADT (ADT naïve (ADT (−)), ADT <2-year, and ADT ≥2-year groups), showed statistical significance, and was 90.7%, 88.2%, and 78.6% (p = 0.0039) for the ADT (−), ADT <2-year, and ADT ≥2-year groups, respectively. In patients aged ≥75 years, 10-year OCMFS for ADT (−), ADT <2-, and ADT ≥2-year groups was 93.5% (at 115.6 months), 85.6%, and 60.7% (p = 0.0189), respectively, whereas it was 90.7%, 89.9%, and 89.0% (p = 0.4716), respectively, in their younger counterparts. In localized prostate cancer patients, treatment with longer ADT for ≥2 years potentially increases the risk of OCM, especially in patients aged ≥75 years.
Highlights
Prostate cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in men in developed countries [1,2]
This study aimed to examine the role of Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men who had been diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and were treated with modern high biological equivalent doses (BEDs) radiotherapy, with a focus on the age factor
We presented here that ADT did not always improve outcomes after high-BED radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer patients
Summary
Prostate cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in men in developed countries [1,2]. Modern radiotherapy routinely delivers higher biological equivalent doses (BEDs) in excess of 74 Gy to the prostate, decisions on the use of additional ADT in high-BED modern radiotherapy have proved inconclusive since a randomized trial to confirm the role of ADT therapy was performed with up to 70 Gy of EBRT [3,6]. Guidelines recommended additional ADT in high-risk patients; [3], limited evidence supports these recommendations of higher BED use in modern radiotherapy (including image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and BT) [7]. This study aimed to examine the role of ADT in men who had been diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and were treated with modern high BED radiotherapy, with a focus on the age factor
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.