Abstract

BackgroundA wide variety of braces are commercially available designed for the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but very few braces for infantile scoliosis (IS) or juvenile scoliosis (JS). The goals of this study were: 1) to briefly introduce an elongation bending derotation brace (EBDB) in the treatment of IS or JS; 2) to investigate changes of Cobb angles in the AP view of X-ray between in and out of the EBDB at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 3) to compare differences of Cobb angles (out of brace) in 3, 6, 9, and12 month with the baseline; 4) to investigate changes (out of brace) in JS and IS groups separately.MethodsThirty-eight patients with IS or JS were recruited retrospectively for this study. Spinal manipulation was performed using a stockinet. This was done simultaneously with a surface topography scan. The procedure was done in the operating room for IS, or in a clinical setting for JS. The brace was edited and fabricated using CAD/CAM method. Radiographs were recorded in and out of bracing approximately every 3 months from baseline to 12 months. A linear mixed effects model was used to compare in and out of bracing, and out of brace Cobb angle change over the 12 month period.ResultsOverall, 37.5% of curves are corrected and 37.5% stabilized after 12 months (Thoracic curves 48% correction, 19% stabilization; thoracolumbar curves 33% correction, 56% stabilization and lumbar curves 29% correction, 50% stabilization). The juvenile group had 25.7% correction and 42.9% stabilization, while the infantile group had 50% correction and 32.1% stabilization. There was a significant Cobb angle in-brace reduction in the thoracic (11°), thoracolumbar (12°), and lumbar (12°) (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant change in out of brace Cobb angle from baseline to month 12 (p > 0.05). No patients required surgery within the 12 month span.ConclusionsThis study describes a new clinical protocol in the development of the EBDB. Short-term results show brace is effective in preventing IS or JS curve progression over a 12 month span.

Highlights

  • A wide variety of braces are commercially available designed for the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but very few braces for infantile scoliosis (IS) or juvenile scoliosis (JS)

  • The purpose of this study was: 1) to briefly describe the preliminary results using the new An elongation bending derotation brace (EBDB) in the treatment of Infantile scoliosis (IS) or JS; 2) to investigate changes of Cobb angles in the AP view of X-ray between in and out of the EBDB bracing; 3) to compare differences of out of brace (OOB) Cobb angles in 3, 6, 9, and12 month with baseline; 4) to investigate Out of brace (OOB) changes in JS and IS groups separately

  • Study recruitment Thirty-eight patients (22 males, 16 females; 17 IS, 21 JS) were recruited retrospectively for this study. 9 children were diagnosed with neuromuscular scoliosis, 1 congenital scoliosis, and 28 with Infantile idiopathic scoliosis (IIS) or Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A wide variety of braces are commercially available designed for the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but very few braces for infantile scoliosis (IS) or juvenile scoliosis (JS). 70 years ago, Dr Blount and Dr Schmidt from our institution developed the Milwaukee brace to control curve progression for children with idiopathic scoliosis. The choices of bracing are prescribed based on the type of spinal deformity, and the extent of their success is due to bracing design and patient compliance [1,2,3]. Most universal designs, including the Milwaukee and most TLSO braces, follow a symmetric pattern. These usually apply a force to the apex of the curve through foam pads integrated to the bracing design by the orthotist.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call