Abstract

The effect of aluminum foam on the pressure oscillation of premixed methane-air deflagrations was investigated using experiments performed in an empty duct and a duct with aluminum foam attached to the upper and lower walls. For a fair comparison, the passage areas of the two ducts are identical when considering a 10 mm thickness of the porous medium. The flame propagation, pressure oscillation, and interaction mechanism between the acoustic wave and flame front are discussed by comparing the flame structure and pressure waveform during premixed methane-air mixture deflagration. The results demonstrate that for the empty duct configuration, the flame propagates as a cellular structure and then evolves into an oscillating flame when approaching the closed end of the duct. The coupling effect of the flame and acoustic waves induces the flame to oscillate violently as the distance from the ignition source to the closed end of the duct (i.e., the ignition position) increases to a threshold value. The magnitude of pressure oscillation increases as the distance between the ignition source and the closed end of the duct increases and reaches a maximum when the ignition position is 700 mm from the closed end. Additionally, the pressure oscillation is consistent with the flame oscillation. This oscillation results in a large deflagration pressure and a high rate of pressure rise. By contrast, the aluminum foam-laden duct completely suppresses the oscillation of the premixed methane-air deflagrations for all ignition positions. The aluminum foam inhibits the coupling effect and consequently restrains the prominent deformation and oscillation of the flame front. Flame oscillation vanishes as the acoustic damping coefficient increases. In this case, there is no oscillation and the leading position of the left flame exhibits a linear relationship with time. Whether the foam material has an inhibitive effect on the deflagration pressure depends on the ignition position. The aluminum foam enhances the deflagration pressure when the ignition position is 100 mm from the closed end, with a 29% increase in the maximum overpressure. By contrast, the aluminum foam attenuates the deflagration pressure for other ignition positions, with a maximum drop ratio of 61.7% at the ignition position being 700 mm from the closed end.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call