Abstract
Iron ores always contain several forms of alumina, which may have different effect on sintering performance. In this paper, sinter pot tests were systematically conducted with various alumina types and contents by means of alumina additives substituting for the corresponding types of alumina, and the relevant action mechanism on sintering performance was clarified by the mineralogy of product sinter. The results show that kaolinite is beneficial to the granulation process rather than other three alumina types. In addition, it contributes to relatively better sintering performance while aluminous goethite ranks the only next, followed by gibbsite and free alumina. Mechanism analysis indicates that kaolinite and aluminous goethite are preferable to achieve relatively lower sinter porosity and higher amount of silico-ferrite of calcium and alumina (SFCA) compared with gibbsite and free alumina. Besides, the former two alumina types are apt to promote the formation of higher strength SFCA such as dendritic and acicular SFCA. Furthermore, much tighter interlocking texture in product sinter is formed as alumina occurs in kaolinite or aluminous goethite. Kaolinite and aluminous goethite are the preferably desirable alumina types for sintering rather than free alumina and gibbsite.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
