Abstract

Proton-exchange membrane fuel cells and electrochemical hydrogen pumps are based on membrane electrode assemblies containing Pt catalysts. During their preparation, a catalyst ink is usually applied to the gas diffusion layer. Among the available methods, ink spray using an airbrush can be advantageous for making electrodes at universities and companies. This work compares the suitability of gravity-feed and suction-feed airbrushes during the evaluation of in-house developed Pt and Pt–Co catalysts. The surface morphology of the catalyst layers was analysed by SEM and EDS and related to the preparation technique. The catalysts were compared against an off-the-shelf commercial catalyst. The in-house Pt catalyst afforded similar polarisation curves as the commercial catalyst whereas the Pt–Co catalyst exhibited a slightly lower performance. The suction-feed airbrush was deemed preferable because it produced cracked mud-like, homogeneous and smoother catalyst layers in contrast to the gravity-feed method, which resulted in poor-quality deposits with loose particles, lower Pt utilisation and higher resistance.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.