Abstract

BackgroundAfter Action Review is a form of facilitated team learning and review of events. The methodology originated in the United States Army and forms part of the Incident Management Framework in the Irish Health Services. After Action Review has been hypothesized to improve safety culture and the effect of patient safety events on staff (second victim experience) in health care settings. Yet little direct evidence exists to support this and its implementation has not been studied.AimTo investigate the effect of After Action Review on safety culture and second victim experience and to examine After Action Review implementation in a hospital setting.MethodsA mixed methods study will be conducted at an Irish hospital. To assess the effect on safety culture and second victim experience, hospital staff will complete surveys before and twelve months after the introduction of After Action Review to the hospital (Hospital Survey on Safety Culture 2.0 and Second Victim Experience and Support Tool). Approximately one in twelve staff will be trained as After Action Review Facilitators using a simulation based training programme. Six months after the After Action Review training, focus groups will be conducted with a stratified random sample of the trained facilitators. These will explore enablers and barriers to implementation using the Theoretical Domains Framework. At twelve months, information will be collected from the trained facilitators and the hospital to establish the quality and resource implications of implementing After Action Review.DiscussionThe results of the study will directly inform local hospital decision-making and national and international approaches to incorporating After Action Review in hospitals and other healthcare settings.

Highlights

  • In healthcare, failure to learn is evidenced by the continued high rates of adverse events [1, 2] that have significant effects on patients, families and healthcare staff [3]

  • Studies in hospitals in the United States (US) [11] and China [12] have demonstrated that a culture of non-punitive response to errors is significantly associated with reductions in second victim distress while the provision of organisational support mediates the relationship between the two variables

  • The iCAARE study has the potential to make a real impact on establishing an evidence base for the effectiveness of After Action Review (AAR) practice in healthcare environments both in Ireland and internationally

Read more

Summary

Background

After Action Review is a form of facilitated team learning and review of events. The methodology originated in the United States Army and forms part of the Incident Management Framework in the Irish Health Services. After Action Review has been hypothesized to improve safety culture and the effect of patient safety events on staff (second victim experience) in health care settings. Little direct evidence exists to support this and its implementation has not been studied.

Methods
Introduction
What can be learned?
Study design
Participants
Ethical considerations
Discussion
Findings
Study limitations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call