Effect of adaptive psychophysical procedure on loudness matches

Abstract

Large variability in equal-loudness matches has been observed across studies. The purpose of the present study was to gain insight into the extent to which this variability results from differences in psychophysical procedures and/or differences among listeners. Four adaptive two-interval, two-alternatives-forced-choice procedures were used to obtain equal-loudness matches between 5- and 200-ms 1-kHz tones as a function of level for each of six normal listeners. The procedures differed primarily in the sequence in which the stimuli were presented. The variations tested were the ordering of stimuli by amplitude across blocks of trials (both increasing and decreasing amplitudes), randomizing the order across those blocks, and randomizing the order within blocks. The random-within-block procedure, which sought to randomize any intertrial information, yielded a significantly greater amount of temporal integration than the other three procedures. The results show significant differences in temporal integration measurements at moderate levels for the same listeners across different procedures. Therefore, although there are individual differences among listeners in the amount of temporal integration measured across paradigms, the choice of paradigm also affects the amount of temporal integration measured at moderate levels.