Effect and Challenges of an Integrated Nutrition-Intervention Package Utilization among Pregnant Women and Lactating Mothers in Rwanda: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

Abstract

BackgroundMalnutrition among pregnant women and lactating mothers remains an issue of public health concern in developing countries. The Gikuriro program, an integrated nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive intervention, was implemented in 5 districts of Rwanda for 5 y to address this problem. Postprogram quasi-experiments showed significant effect of the intervention on maternal and child undernutrition. Notwithstanding, there was a need for a qualitative study to explore the views of the beneficiaries and implementers regarding its benefits, challenges, and limitations to inform future interventions. ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the effect and challenges of an integrated nutrition-intervention program among pregnant women and lactating mothers. MethodsThis was a qualitative study involving 25 community health officers and 27 nutritionists as key informants and 80 beneficiaries in 10 focus group discussions. All interviews and group discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and double coded. A deductive and inductive content analysis approach was used with the help of ATLAS.ti, version 9.15. ResultsThe study identified several positive effects, such as improved knowledge and skills on nutrition, a positive mindset toward a balanced diet, perceived improved nutrition, and economic independence among pregnant women and lactating mothers. However, some of the main obstacles of the integrated nutrition intervention were lack of awareness of the program, negative beliefs, poverty, lack of spousal support, and time constraints. Moreover, the study identified a main limitation: the lack of inclusiveness for all social categories. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that integrated nutrition interventions have perceived positive effect on nutrition; however, such interventions may face some challenges and limitations. These findings suggest that, apart from contributing to the body of evidence for scale up of such interventions in resource-limited settings, economic challenges and misconceptions have to be addressed to maximize the effect of such interventions.