Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the quality of different obturation techniques in primary teeth (navitip, endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe and reamer as a control) by using peri-apical radiograph. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human lower primary second molar teeth with minimum 7 mm root length were randomly divided in to four groups (Group one-navitip, Group two-endodontic pressure syringe, Group three – insulin syringe, Group four- reamer) were included in the study. Peri apical radiograph images were taken after the obturation for each group.To evalute over filling, under filling and optimal filling. Result: The results showed no significant differences between the four groups for the length of obturation (P > 0.05). Navitip and endodontic pressure syringe showed the best results for the length of obturation (50.0% optimal fillings) and insulin syringe showed (45.o% optimal fillings) for the length of obturation. Reamer showed (40.0%). Conclusion: The studies showed that all obturation techniques used didn’t provide ideal obturation with nearly comparable obturation quality for the techniques.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call