Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the quality of different obturation techniques in primary teeth (navitip, endodontic pressure syringe, insulin syringe and reamer as a control) by using peri-apical radiograph. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human lower primary second molar teeth with minimum 7 mm root length were randomly divided in to four groups (Group one-navitip, Group two-endodontic pressure syringe, Group three – insulin syringe, Group four- reamer) were included in the study. Peri apical radiograph images were taken after the obturation for each group.To evalute over filling, under filling and optimal filling. Result: The results showed no significant differences between the four groups for the length of obturation (P > 0.05). Navitip and endodontic pressure syringe showed the best results for the length of obturation (50.0% optimal fillings) and insulin syringe showed (45.o% optimal fillings) for the length of obturation. Reamer showed (40.0%). Conclusion: The studies showed that all obturation techniques used didn’t provide ideal obturation with nearly comparable obturation quality for the techniques.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have