Abstract

The recent past years have seen a noticeable increase of interest for electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze functional connectivity through brain sources reconstructed from scalp signals. Although considerable advances have been done both on the recording and analysis of EEG signals, a number of methodological questions are still open regarding the optimal way to process the data in order to identify brain networks. In this paper, we analyze the impact of three factors that intervene in this processing: i) the number of scalp electrodes, ii) the combination between the algorithm used to solve the EEG inverse problem and the algorithm used to measure the functional connectivity and iii) the frequency bands retained to estimate the functional connectivity among neocortical sources. Using High-Resolution (hr) EEG recordings in healthy volunteers, we evaluated these factors on evoked responses during picture recognition and naming task. The main reason for selection this task is that a solid literature background is available about involved brain networks (ground truth). From this a priori information, we propose a performance criterion based on the number of connections identified in the regions of interest (ROI) that belong to potentially activated networks. Our results show that the three studied factors have a dramatic impact on the final result (the identified network in the source space) as strong discrepancies were evidenced depending on the methods used. They also suggest that the combination of weighted Minimum Norm Estimator (wMNE) and the Phase Synchronization (PS) methods applied on High-Resolution EEG in beta/gamma bands provides the best performance in term of topological distance between the identified network and the expected network in the above-mentioned cognitive task.

Highlights

  • Neuroimaging techniques can be used to identify brain networks involved in normal brain functions as well as in neurological disorders like epilepsy, autism or schizophrenia [1,2,3]

  • We proposed two criteria based on the definition of 7 (4 left and 3 right) distinct regions of interest (ROIs) reported to be involved in the cognitive task performed by the subjects

  • A typical example of the connectivity graphs obtained for the 20 different combinations of the source reconstruction and functional connectivity methods is presented in figure 3, for the two montages (32 and hr)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuroimaging techniques can be used to identify brain networks involved in normal brain functions (learning, memory, behavior adaptation to stimuli or emotions) as well as in neurological disorders like epilepsy, autism or schizophrenia [1,2,3]. Interpretation of connectivity measures from sensor level recordings is not straightforward, as these recordings suffer from a low spatial resolution and are severely corrupted by effects of field spread [14] To overcome these difficulties, several attempts to apply connectivity methods on the temporal dynamics of brain sources reconstructed from scalp EEG/MEG signals have been reported [5,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], see [14] for review). Volume conduction effects can never be completely abolished in source space

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call