Abstract

The impact of repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cortex varies with stimulation parameters, so it would be useful to develop a biomarker to rapidly judge effects on cortical activity, including regions other than motor cortex. This study evaluated rTMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEP) after 1 Hz of motor cortex stimulation. New features are controls for baseline amplitude and comparison to control groups of sham stimulation. We delivered 200 test pulses at 0.20 Hz before and after 1500 treatment pulses at 1 Hz. Sequences comprised AAA = active stimulation with the same coil for test–treat–test phases (n = 22); PPP = realistic placebo coil stimulation for all three phases (n = 10); and APA = active coil stimulation for tests and placebo coil stimulation for treatment (n = 15). Signal processing displayed the evoked EEG waveforms, and peaks were measured by software. ANCOVA was used to measure differences in TEP peak amplitudes in post-rTMS trials while controlling for pre-rTMS TEP peak amplitude. Post hoc analysis showed reduced P60 amplitude in the active (AAA) rTMS group versus the placebo (APA) group. The N100 peak showed a treatment effect compared to the placebo groups, but no pairwise post hoc differences. N40 showed a trend toward increase. Changes were seen in widespread EEG leads, mostly ipsilaterally. TMS-evoked EEG potentials showed reduction of the P60 peak and increase of the N100 peak, both possibly reflecting increased slow inhibition after 1 Hz of rTMS. TMS-EEG may be a useful biomarker to assay brain excitability at a seizure focus and elsewhere, but individual responses are highly variable, and the difficulty of distinguishing merged peaks complicates interpretation.

Highlights

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [1,2], repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [3,4], and intermittent or continuous theta burst stimulation [5] have been evaluated for therapeutic effects in numerous clinical conditions

  • There was no significant change in motor evoked potential (MEP) after 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (p = 0.26, Cohen’s d = 0.17)

  • The analysis revealed a significant effect of experimental group, F(2, 40) = 3.295, ηp2 = 0.141, 1–β = 0.593, and p = 0.047, with N100 descriptively more negative amplitudes in the AAA group compared to the other groups after rTMS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [1,2], repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) [3,4], and intermittent or continuous theta burst stimulation [5] have been evaluated for therapeutic effects in numerous clinical conditions. Results vary and the optimal parameters of stimulation remain uncertain. Of seven controlled studies of rTMS as a treatment for epilepsy, two have been favorable for seizure improvement [6,7] and five documented transient, little, or no benefit against seizures [8,9,10,11,12]. Small variations of stimulation parameters or locations can lead to widely varying– sometimes opposite–clinical responses [13]. Low-frequency stimulation at 0.5–1 Hz depresses motor cortex excitability [14], whereas 5 Hz of stimulation increases excitability [15]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call