Abstract

A set of images can be considered as meaningfully different for an observer if they can be distinguished phenomenally from one another. Each phenomenal difference must be supported by some neurophysiological differences. Differentiation analysis aims to quantify neurophysiological differentiation evoked by a given set of stimuli to assess its meaningfulness to the individual observer. As a proof of concept using high-density EEG, we show increased neurophysiological differentiation for a set of natural, meaningfully different images in contrast to another set of artificially generated, meaninglessly different images in nine participants. Stimulus-evoked neurophysiological differentiation (over 257 channels, 800 ms) was systematically greater for meaningful vs. meaningless stimulus categories both at the group level and for individual subjects. Spatial breakdown showed a central-posterior peak of differentiation, consistent with the visual nature of the stimulus sets. Temporal breakdown revealed an early peak of differentiation around 110 ms, prominent in the central-posterior region; and a later, longer-lasting peak at 300–500 ms that was spatially more distributed. The early peak of differentiation was not accompanied by changes in mean ERP amplitude, whereas the later peak was associated with a higher amplitude ERP for meaningful images. An ERP component similar to visual-awareness-negativity occurred during the nadir of differentiation across all image types. Control stimulus sets and further analysis indicate that changes in neurophysiological differentiation between meaningful and meaningless stimulus sets could not be accounted for by spatial properties of the stimuli or by stimulus novelty and predictability.

Highlights

  • Consider seeing two images of particular person’s face; in one image the individual is smiling and in the other frowning

  • The significance of group level effects was assessed using non-parametric permutation statistics (1000 permutations), on the linear mixed model with meaningfulness used as the predictor to individual categorical differentiation

  • The results show that neurophysiological differentiation was higher for the meaningful set of images than for a less meaningful set of images both at the group level and for individual subjects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Consider seeing two images of particular person’s face; in one image the individual is smiling and in the other frowning. Our experience of these images will be meaningfully different the physical properties of the images may only have changed marginally. Consider seeing two images of unique television noise. Our experience of these images will be essentially identical despite there being no correlation between the images. We define meaningful differences as any phenomenally distinguishable aspect of the images.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call