Abstract

There are several knowledge acquisition tools that use repertory grids as a technique to elicitate knowledge. One of the steps involved in this technique is the debugging of the grid using procedures based on cluster analysis. Most of these tools employ a Euclidean metric for the clustering. However, some authors find evidence that people use the city block metric when rating similarities. In this paper, the tool ComPar ( Comparación de Pares), developed to acquire data in a knowledge engineering experiment, is described. This tool tries to determine what kind of metric is the most often used by people in similarity judgments. After the experiment, it was concluded that there is evidence that individuals use mainly a city block metric when trying to judge similarity between different things. Accordingly, a tool supporting the repertory grid technique called EECB ( emparrillado euclı́deo, “city block” in Spanish) was developed afterwards, allowing the possibility of distance calculations using city block metric.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.