Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses are often used by health technology appraisal agencies to inform reimbursement decisions for new therapies. These evaluations, however, are often performed adopting a payer’s perspective that does not include important elements of value that treatments may generate (e.g., increased productivity, reduced caregiving costs, patients’ hope, option value, or insurance value). There is currently limited evidence quantifying condition-specific novel value elements.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call