Educational needs of internal medicine residency graduates: general internist versus subspecialists

Abstract

Residency training is inadequate with respect to the needs of general internal medicine doctors in several areas. We undertook this study to determine the practice habits and educational requirements of general versus subspecialty internists. A survey was mailed to 138 doctors who had completed at least a three-year university-based internal medicine post-graduate training. Sixty-three (46%) responded, of whom 32 completed additional training in a subspecialty of internal medicine. Many (14 of 32) subspecialists described their practice as general internal medicine (GIM) with a subspecialty emphasis. GIM was as important to their practice as it was to the general internists. General internists saw non-internal medicine disciplines as important but subspecialists did not. General internists frequently performed procedures that were not formally taught during training, while subspecialists rarely if ever performed a procedure outside the scope of their fellowship training. Internal medicine training programmes should be able to individualize training based on the career choices of trainees such that training will more fully prepare trainees for practice.