Abstract
BackgroundAccording to the cognitive-reserve concept, higher educated dementia patients tolerate more brain pathology than lower educated patients with similar impairment. Here, we examined whether higher education is associated with more severe dopamine terminal loss at the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). MethodsDopamine transporter (DaT) SPECT information of 352 de novo PD patients and 172 healthy controls (HC) were retrieved from PPMI. Correlation analyses were performed between education years and regional DaT signal (i.e., putamen, caudate, striatum), correcting for UPDRS-III, age, sex and MoCA. Second, using a median split on education (Md = 16 yrs), high and low education groups were determined, which were matched for demographic and/or clinical scores and compared based on regional DaT signals. Finally, moderation analyses were conducted in the PD cohort, assessing the effect of education on the relation between putaminal DaT capacity and UPDRS-III. All analyses were performed across the entire cohorts and separately for three age ranges (sixth, seventh and eighth life decade). ResultsOnly PD patients in their eighth life decade presented a positive association between education and regional dopamine signalling. A significant moderation effect of education on the association between putaminal DaT signal loss and motor symptom severity was observed in this group (B=3.377, t=3.075, p = .003). The remaining analyses did not yield any significant results, neither in the PD nor HC cohort. ConclusionHigher education is not related with greater tolerance against dopamine loss in PD, but may nonetheless assert protective effects at more advanced age.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.