Abstract

The article starts with the serious question of why educational reforms do not lead to better learning. Although access to education has increased remarkably, the quality of education can be very low. The reality is that by 2030 there will be 800 million young people who do not have basic skills in reading and math. The answers will be sought from the concept of the educational ecosystem and how different subsystems, such as curriculum system, evaluation systems, teacher education policy, and the labour market, should be interconnected, and the systemic changes supported by all these subsystems. The basic conditions are that different actors and stakeholders work in collaboration, there are active interactions within and between different subsystems for supporting both equity and quality in education. Educational reforms are complex processes and need diverse partners and governance in which trust is present. The article also provides a brief case description in Finnish contexts of how educational reforms have been implemented in the frame of the ecosystem concept. In the end, the article summarises how educational ecosystems could help in overcoming global learning crises.

Highlights

  • The article starts with the serious question of why educational reforms do not lead to better learning

  • This study aimed to find out why educational reforms fail or be successful

  • We could find much evidence for failures: if different parts of the educational systems do not work in close cooperation, share information, and invite partners who work at different levels or sectors of the system, there will be many risks that reforms do not achieve their aims

Read more

Summary

Hannele Niemi

Članek se začne z resnim vprašanjem, zakaj šolske reforme ne vodijo k boljšemu znanju. The implementation required extensive communication, joint activities, decisions and other actions, including the following (Laukkanen, 2006; Niemi & Lavonen, 2020; Sahlberg, 2007, 2011): 1) new TE requirements raising primary school TE to the master’s level; 2) the strong allocation of educational resources to lower secondary education at the beginning of the transformation and increasingly for weak students and inclusion policy; 3) the discontinuation of streaming and ensuring lifelong learning; 4) new evaluation systems and commitment to enhancement-led principles in evaluations; 5) inviting partners to reforms, moving towards decentralisation in decision-making and asking varied stakeholders for input; and 6) establishing platforms for continuous collaboration and dialogue. Finland has many challenges to be solved: increasing gaps between learners from different socioeconomic statuses and gender differences in learning outcomes (Välijärvi-Sulkunen, 2016); still there is much work to be done, despite Finland’s position as one of the top-performing educational countries in the world

Conclusion
Findings
Biographical note
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call