Abstract

Background and Study HypothesisAre dyslexic children and teenagers more creative than non-dyslexic children and teenagers? Whether creativity is higher in dyslexia, and whether this could be related to neurological development specific to the dyslexic disorder, or to compensatory strategies acquired later in life, remains unclear. Here, we suggest an additional role of differential educational approaches taken in each school that could either enhance or suppress an already higher baseline creativity of dyslexic children and teenagers.ResultsCreativity in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children and teenagers from different schools in France and in Belgium, as well as in students from different universities, was evaluated with the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Children and teenagers with dyslexia and/or with other similar dysfunctions showed higher creativity scores than non-dyslexic participants. Moreover, the educational approach could further enhance the creative scores in dyslexia, which could be as high as those measured in students from art universities.ConclusionsWe conclude that dyslexic children and teenagers can be highly creative. Yet, expression of creativity can be modulated by educational approach, indicating a probable advantage for personal follow-up compared to normalizing education strategies.

Highlights

  • The educational approach could further enhance the creative scores in dyslexia, which could be as high as those measured in students from art universities

  • We conclude that dyslexic children and teenagers can be highly creative

  • Expression of creativity can be modulated by educational approach, indicating a probable advantage for personal follow-up compared to normalizing education strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Education Influences Creativity in Dyslexia of Creative Thinking (TTCT) in 1966 [3] This American psychologist defined creativity as: “a process of becoming sensitive to problems, deficiencies, gaps in knowledge, missing elements, disharmonies, and so on; identifying the difficulty; searching for solutions, making guesses, or formulating hypotheses about the deficiencies: testing and retesting these hypotheses and possibly modifying and retesting them; and communicating the results”. The norms for his test have been adjusted four times (1974, 1984, 1990, and 1998) and translated into more than 35 languages.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call