Abstract

Swedish industrialization at the turn of the century 1900 severely hit the trades, which were the traditional source of income for blind people. The public debate caused by the new conditions led to a political decision in 1934 that provided for state-financed compensation for blindness. This decision reveals that politicians, experts and blind people themselves agreed to view “the blind” as a group of disabled persons that was particularly dependent on public support. This article focuses on underlying norms and identities present in this debate. The instruments for the study are adapted from the historian Anders Berge and the sociologists Zygmunt Bauman and Richard Jenkins. Berge argues that social policy a century ago combined the ambition to create some security and to provide moral education. Bauman and Jenkins have developed theories concerning the process of identity creation based upon a “we-and-them” perspective.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call