Abstract
The education of the children of migrants is a policy issue of great importance in both China and the United States. While first generation migrants have generally completed their education in the place of origin, and some may return, their children will generally remain in the receiving place. Both pragmatic and moral considerations therefore require that schools equip them to participate fully in society as workers and citizens. This paper considers what we know about the education of children of low-skilled international labor migrants in the United States and the children of rural–urban migrants in China. It finds that although one migration flow is international and the other internal, the similar background characteristics of migrants create common challenges in both contexts; and the structure of both education systems serves to exacerbate underlying socio-economic inequalities. Residential segregation, unequal funding and formal and informal tracking processes concentrate migrant children in poor quality schools, resulting in low average levels of attainment and high drop-out rates. There are some obvious steps that could be taken in China to expand opportunities for migrant children, especially with regard to the transition to post-compulsory education, which is still constrained by their parents’ household registration status (hukou). However, the experience of the United States shows that expanding access, while necessary, is not sufficient to level the playing field. To do this, targeted investments must be made to meet the specific educational needs of migrant children.
Highlights
China and the United States are most often discussed in terms of their differences, but there are areas in which the two countries face similar challenges, and one is in managing the impacts of large scale population migration (Roberts 1997)
While first generation migrants have generally completed their education in the place of origin, and some may return, their children will generally remain in the receiving place
This paper considers what we know about the education of children of low-skilled international labor migrants in the United States and the children of rural–urban migrants in China
Summary
China and the United States are most often discussed in terms of their differences, but there are areas in which the two countries face similar challenges, and one is in managing the impacts of large scale population migration (Roberts 1997). When children of migrants make up a substantial proportion of the school-age population, and of the future citizenry and workforce, the success of school systems in integrating them has important repercussions for economic development, social stratification and social cohesion. Given the importance of education systems in migrant integration, this article considers the extent to which similar challenges are involved in providing education for the children of rural–urban labor migrants in China and children of low-skilled international migrants in the US, and what can be learned from juxtaposing the two experiences. It references some of the relevant research on Europe. The analysis draws on research conducted as part of the Social Science Research Council’s Working Groups on Education and Migration (Alba and Holdaway 2009; Holdaway et al 2009), and Migration and Development (DeWind and Holdaway 2008); the Immigrant Second Generation in Metropolitan New York (Kasinitz et al 2008); the Children of Immigrants in Schools project (Alba and Holdaway 2013); and the CASSSSRC Common Concerns Seminar Series (Zheng et al 2016).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.