Abstract

Academy of Management ReviewVol. 43, No. 4 From the EditorEditors’ Comments: Is Organizational Behavior Overtheorized?Peter H. Kim, Robert E. Ployhart and Cristina B. GibsonPeter H. Kim, Robert E. Ployhart and Cristina B. GibsonPublished Online:11 Oct 2018https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0233AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESBandura, A. 1990. Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46: 27–46. Google ScholarBazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. 2011. Blind spots Prince-ton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google ScholarBentham, J. 1781. The principles of morals and legislation Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. Google ScholarDetert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. 2007. Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 869–884.Link , Google ScholarFelin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Academy of Management Annals, 9: 575–632.Link , Google ScholarHaidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814–834. Google ScholarHannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929–964. Google ScholarKant, I. 1785. Grounding for the metaphysics of morals (Translated by J. W. Ellington.) Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Google ScholarKeltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110: 265–284. Google ScholarKim, P. H., Pinkley, R. L., & Fragale, A. R. 2005. Power dynamics in negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30: 799–822.Link , Google ScholarLewin, K. 1951. Field theory in social sciences New York: Harper & Row. Google ScholarMazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. 2008. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45: 633–644. Google ScholarMcDaniel, D., & Gibson, C. B. 2012. Emergent ideas in emerging markets: The process of discovery in organizational research. In C. L. WangD. J. Ketchen, Jr.D. D. Bergh (Eds.), West meets East: Building theoretical bridges, vol. 8: 39–59. Bingley, UK: Emerald Press. Google ScholarMonin, B., & Miller, D. T. 2001. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 33–43. Google ScholarNemeth, C. J. 1986. Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93: 23–32. Google ScholarThorngate, W. 1976. “In general” vs. “it depends”: Some comments of the Gergen-Schlenker debate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2: 404–410. Google ScholarTrope, Y., & Liberman, N. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117: 440–463. Google ScholarUhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. 2015. A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10: 72–81. Google ScholarVan de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. 2006. Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31: 802–821.Link , Google ScholarWeick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGhost in the Machine: On Organizational Theory in the Age of Machine LearningKeith Leavitt, Kira Schabram, Prashanth Hariharan and Christopher M. Barnes25 October 2021 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 4The Dark Side of Construct Convergence: Navigating Consensus, Evolution, and Practical Relevance in Theory BuildingDana McDaniel Sumpter, Danna Greenberg and Sharon H. Kim21 September 2021 | Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 35, No. 3 Vol. 43, No. 4 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 11 October 2018 Published in print 1 October 2018 Information© Academy of Management ReviewDownload PDF

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call