Editorial

Abstract

Australian Occupational Therapy JournalVolume 35, Issue 3 p. 98-101 Free Access Editorial Anne Cusick, Anne Cusick Associate EditorSearch for more papers by this author Anne Cusick, Anne Cusick Associate EditorSearch for more papers by this author First published: September 1988 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.1988.tb01613.xCitations: 3AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Baines, C. J. (1987). Editorial: Reviewing the reviewers Canadian Medical Association Journal, 137(1), 15. Cowen, E. L., Spinell, A., Hightower, A. D. and Lotyczewski, B. H. (1987). Author reactions to the manuscript revision process. American Psychologist, 42, 403– 405. Crandall, R. (1977). How qualified are editors? American Psychologist, 32, 578– 579. Crandall, R. (1978). Interrater agreement on manuscripts is not so bad! American Psychologist, 33, 623– 624. Crandall, R. (1986). Peer review: Improving editorial procedures, Bioscience, 36, 607– 609. Crandall, R. (1987). We need research on what constitutes good journal papers — and good editing — not guesswork on how to improve manuscripts! American Psychologist, 42, 407– 408. Cusick, A. (1987). Editorial: Research — Production, publication and practise or perish? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 34(3), 85– 88. Dixon, G. F., Schonfeld, S. A., Altman, M. and Whitcomb, M. E. (1983). The peer review and editorial process: A limited evaluation. American Journal of Medicine, 74(3) 494– 5. Lewis, E. P. (1980). Perishing while publishing: As the editor sees it Nursing Outlook 28(11) 689– 690. Lindsey, D. (1977). Participation and influence in publication review proceedings: A reply. American Psychologist, 32, 579– 586. Morgan, P. P. (1981). Editorial: Author, editor and reviewer: How manuscripts become journal articles. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 124(6) 664– 666. Scarr, S. and Weber, B. L. (1978). The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. American Psychologist, 33, 935. Wong, P. T. (1981). Implicit editorial policies and the integrity of psychology as an empirical science. American Psychologist, 36, 690– 691. Citing Literature Volume35, Issue3September 1988Pages 98-101 ReferencesRelatedInformation