Editorial Commentary: Optimizing Surgical Management of Ankle Fractures: Is Arthroscopy the Answer?

Abstract

The surgical management of ankle fractures can be an unforgiving endeavor. Subtle malreductions in fracture fragments lead to significant deviations in joint reactive forces and, consequently, accelerated arthritis. The diagnosis of associated ligamentous pathology, such as deltoid and syndesmotic injuries, is often difficult and ideal surgical management is debated. Ankle fractures that are seemingly optimally managed using traditional surgical techniques may remain persistently painful and function poorly—a scenario that begs the question, was there more to the injury than met the eye (or radiographs)? Here, unrecognized concomitant intra-articular injuries and subtle surgical malreductions have been implicated. In my practice, concurrent ankle arthroscopy at the time of definitive acute ankle fracture reduction and fixation results in improved accuracy of reduction, evaluation and management of concomitant syndesmotic and ligamentous injuries, assessment and treatment of occult intra-articular injuries, options for less-invasive fixation techniques through arthroscopic reduction, and a means to provide prognostic patient information. I typically reserve its use for fracture patterns that have been more closely associated with intra-articular injuries: high-energy mechanism injuries, Weber B and C fibula fractures, and those with a high likelihood of syndesmotic disruption based on preoperative imaging. Despite these intuitive advantages, concurrent ankle arthroscopy for acute fracture fixation is not routinely performed by most orthopedic surgeons, and a relative dearth of literature regarding its use and clinical impact remains.