Abstract
The rapid growth in reconstructive urology has resulted in the proliferation of fellowships and increased resident exposure to reconstructive urological cases, driving further interest in the field. This article characterizes the early results of the Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS) fellowship match. This study is important because it opens the GURS match to future study. However, there are several things this article does not do. A comparative analysis of prematch graduates was not performed and this survey was not designed to determine if the current match is better.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
