Abstract
The inconsistent adoption of the WHO 5th edition (2010) semen analysis reporting standard by laboratories is a huge problem in clinical andrology. Although the study by [First author last name] and colleagues has a few methodological shortcomings, its simple design is particularly effective at conveying the magnitude of this widespread problem. For those in a reproductive medicine specialty practice it will not be surprising, but for the rest of the urology community it will be staggering to see that over a third of US laboratories are performing semen analyses according to decades-old standards. 1 Place reference for present study (currently unknown): “Inconsistent Adoption of World Health Organization V (2010) Semen Analysis Reference Ranges in the United States Six Years After Publication” Google Scholar
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
