Editorial: a changing post-pandemic world for labour

Abstract

2 | International Union Rights | 28/2 EDITORIAL Editorial: a changing post-pandemic world for labour The latest edition of IUR focuses on changes taking place in and around the world of work. Our selection reveals labour law reforms but no consistent pattern, with progressive announcements in some countries and sweeping attacks in others. We open with welcome news from the US, where the Biden administration has quickly introduced much needed reforms. Lynn Rhinehart describes the so-called PRO-Act as ‘by far the most significant piece of labour law legislation in decades’ promising to stop employer interference in union elections, restore workers’ bargaining power, improve relief for illegally fired workers, and override ‘right to work’ laws. It seems the US could rapidly see very significant improvements for trade union rights. As David Bacon’s piece on union access to farm workers reveals, however, there remains strong opposition to even basic union rights for even low paid and temporary workers. Over in Ukraine it is a different picture. As in other former Soviet states, the aspects of trade union law that were the bedrock of a very strong framework of social protection are being identified by a modernising administration as archaic barriers to business. Rights and privileges such as union ownership of and provision of fitness and holiday institutions - which gave trade unions considerable powers within the workplace and indeed a strong social role generally – are also all under threat. In New Zealand there is also a sense of radical reform, albeit it a very positive and pro-union agenda, with the government promising a new sectoral bargaining framework. Many looking at the proposals see real possibilities, but if the government is so supportive of workers’ rights why has the country not ratified ILO Convention No. 87, and why are the nurses on strike again? The background to the recent violent repression of a strike at a power station in Banshkhali in Bangladesh is set out for us by Anupoma Joyeeta Joyee. Seven strikers were shot dead at Banshkhali, making it one of the most severe recent cases of strike repression, though one that has been largely overlooked by the global unions. ICTUR is further dismayed to record the killing of another migrant worker activist from one of Italy’s base unions, which appears also to have gone unmentioned by the ITUC. And Labourstart’s Eric Lee raises with us another recent case where he argues similarly that the global unions could and should have responded to the case of an arrested migrant rights activist. We turn then to the other aspect of change discussed in this edition of IUR, which concerns not labour law but the changing nature of work and new trade union strategies and practices. Associate Professor Huang Yu brings a warning from China that workers are so far failing to fight for ‘the robot dividend’, managing at best to sustain conditions. And the other dramatic transformation affecting trade union work over the past 18 months has been the struggle to adapt and continue trade union work under the conditions of the pandemic. Dr. Niall Cullianane and Gareth Murphy discuss how the Irish FSU union has adapted to online tools, celebrating some success, ‘the shift to online unionism enhanced some opportunities for officers and staff to share ideas more frequently’, but noting that ‘socially distanced’ outdoor meetings were still regarded as important, and that ‘exchanges with employers have been less than ideal’. Hazel Nolan discusses relating themes around online outreach and activism in a major dispute with British Gas, revealing unexpected potential for online trade unionism to have a dramatic impact and to generate an impressive level of activism and member involvement. We close this edition of IUR with thoughts from ICTUR President and Vice President Lord John Hendy QC and Professor Keith Ewing, who remind trade unionists of the importance of language with their warning against the pernicious phrase ‘the labour market’, which they argue is giving ‘legitimacy to a capitalist mythology in which buying and selling labour is a natural and unalterable part of the human condition’. Daniel Blackburn, Editor Next issue of IUR Articles between 850 and 1800 words should be sent by email (mail...