Abstract
This Note describes and softly prescribes a queer legal theoretic sensibility, a sensibility receptive to and promotional of legal regimes least inhospitable to gender pluralism and erotic flourishing. The sensibility accretes from first, the costs of law (or the fact that laws have costs), and second, the author’s peculiar affection for his high school Latin teacher’s habitus. The Note overviews the contributions of this issue of CAL, highlighting the essays’ emphases on ungay queer subjects as well as the queerness of sexual violence politics.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
