Abstract
The mailbox for most editors looks like a grab bag in a windstorm. Filled with surprises and never lacking in interest, it provides a cross section of medical opinion, of likes and dislikes. Some is published in the correspondence section ofThe Journal; some is answered directly from the Editor's office or is referred to a more appropriate office for reply; and some is handled with asbestos gloves. We are joking about the latter, of course, but the mail is varied and never dull. From time to time readers of The Journal become indignant when their letters of protest about some action are not published inThe Journal. They accuse the Editor of being high-handed and arbitrary, of being biased, and of being out of touch with the facts of life. And they may honestly believe they have good reason for such accusations. Unfortunately, some may not realize that The
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
