Editor's Comment and Q&A: Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the presence of alveolar defects (dehiscence and fenestration) in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusions and different facial types. Methods Cone-beam computed tomography records of 79 patients with Class I and 80 patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions and no previous orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The sample included 4319 teeth. All teeth were analyzed by 2 examiners who evaluated sectional images in axial and cross-sectional views to check for the presence or absence of dehiscence and fenestration on the buccal and lingual surfaces. Results Dehiscence was associated with 51.09% of all teeth, and fenestration with 36.51%. The Class I malocclusion patients had a greater prevalence of dehiscence: 35% higher than those with Class II Division 1 malocclusion ( P Conclusions Alveolar defects are a common finding before orthodontic treatment, especially in Class I patients, but they are not related to the facial types.