Abstract

With thousands of chemicals discharged into the aquatic environment, it is necessary to identify those that are likely to be having the greatest impact on wildlife to better protect the ecosystem. A risk ranking approach was developed to compare the ecotoxicological risk of chemicals on aquatic wildlife with a wide range of environmental measurement data and ecotoxicity data. Nineteen metals including some rarely monitored ones including antimony (Sb), molybdenum (Mo), cobalt (Co), vanadium (V), titanium (Ti) and thallium (Tl) in the lower Yangtze River were risk ranked as a case study. The risk ranking approach was conducted in three tiers: general risk ranking, lethal effects vs. non-lethal effects risk ranking, and species group-specific risk ranking. Iron, copper and titanium were identified as being of greatest concern. The contamination of iron, zinc, copper and nickel was widespread and may have already harmed wildlife according to the overlap between ecotoxicity and monitored levels. Based on this analysis, the risk from copper and some rarely monitored metals (titanium and boron) may have been underestimated. Greater efforts to reduce copper, iron and titanium contamination could make an important difference to the health of Chinese freshwater organisms in the Yangtze River.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call