Abstract

Forest Management Units (FMU) are areas of state forest that are designated for commercial timber harvest. They also serve subsistence needs for neighboring villages, but there has to date been no assessment of these services for local people. Neither has there been a formal assessment of the impacts of timber harvest on the ecosystem services. Using a participatory research approach of focus group discussion, we aimed to identify local community perceptions of the priority ecosystem services from FMU forests and to assess the perceived changes of these services after forestry operations. We conducted focus groups segregated by gender with members from eight villages associated with five FMUs in eastern and central Bhutan. The priority services identified by communities, in their own terms, included land productivity, fresh water, timber, fresh air, stone, carbon sequestration, spiritual and religious value, pollination, and local weather regulation. There were minor variations in prioritization of different services across communities and gender groups within communities. Local communities perceived that the ecosystem services provided by the forests within the designated FMU areas have declined over the period of 2006-2016. Community members expressed concern that the decline resulted mainly from excessive extraction of timber and water resources, and reduction of natural regeneration, particularly on broadleaf forests. Therefore, we identify a need for biophysical studies to seek evidence for causal linkages between the manners of natural resource use and the status of ecosystem services. This will fill the knowledge gap between perceived and actual changes that could then drive changes in forest policy and forest management to improve forest management systems. Until then, the conclusions from this study suggest that people depend on a diversity of services from forests that they have access to but do not govern.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Forest ecosystem servicesThe benefits that humans obtain from forests are vitally important for rural livelihood in the Himalaya (Bhatta et al, 2015)

  • Provisioning and cultural services were readily recognized by villagers, while difficulty arose in recognizing the indirect services of habitat and ecological regulation

  • Scientific forest management in the forest management units (FMU) based on the annual allowable cut was assumed by the state foresters to allow for sustained timber yield from the forest for both commercial and subsistence demand

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The benefits that humans obtain from forests are vitally important for rural livelihood in the Himalaya (Bhatta et al, 2015). Forested ecosystems and natural rivers and wetlands are critical in mountain regions that receive high amounts of precipitation, such as in eastern Himalaya, since forests serve to moderate the overland flow of precipitation and snow melt (Bathurst et al, 2011). Permanent conversion of forest to grassland or other non-forest cover may result in permanent increase in total water runoff in a watershed (FAO and CIFOR, 2005). Forests provide an array of other benefits and meanings. Research and popular notions agree that forests provide critical regulating services in mountain landscape in eastern Himalaya (Måren et al, 2014; Rinzin et al, 2009). Forests filter particulate matter from air pollution (Terzaghi et al, 2013), and they generate and regulate micro-climates, including in streams (Dan Moore et al, 2005), maintaining both warmer and cooler understory air and soil, depending on the season (Chen et al, 1999)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call