Abstract

Forest water use efficiency (WUE), the ratio of gross primary productivity (GPP) to evapotranspiration (ET), is an important variable to understand the coupling between water and carbon cycles, and to assess resource use, ecosystem resilience, and commodity production. Here, we determined WUE for managed loblolly pine plantations over the course of a rotation on the coastal plain of North Carolina in the eastern U.S. We found that the forest annual GPP, ET, and WUE increased until age ten, which stabilized thereafter. WUE varied annually (2–44%), being higher at young plantation (YP, 3.12 ± 1.20 g C kg−1 H2O d−1) compared to a mature plantation (MP, 2.92 ± 0.45 g C kg−1 H2O d−1), with no distinct seasonal patterns. Stand age was strongly correlated with ET (R2 = 0.71) and GPP (R2 = 0.64). ET and GPP were tightly coupled (R2 = 0.86). Radiation and air temperature significantly affected GPP and ET (R2 = 0.71 − R2 = 0.82) at a monthly scale, but not WUE. Drought affected WUE (R2 = 0.35) more than ET (R2 = 0.25) or GPP (R2 = 0.07). A drought enhanced GPP in MP (19%) and YP (11%), but reduced ET 7% and 19% in MP and YP, respectively, resulting in a higher WUE (27–32%). Minor seasonal and interannual variation in forest WUE of MP (age > 10) suggested that forest functioning became stable as stands matured. We conclude that carbon and water cycles in loblolly pine plantations are tightly coupled, with different characteristics in different ages and hydrologic regimes. A stable WUE suggests that the pine ecosystem productivity can be readily predicted from ET and vice versa. The tradeoffs between water and carbon cycling should be recognized in forest management to achieve multiple ecosystem services (i.e., water supply and carbon sequestration).

Highlights

  • Introduction distributed under the terms andEcosystem water use efficiency (WUE) is expressed as the fraction of carbon gained through gross primary productivity (GPP) to water lost through evapotranspiration (ET)at the ecosystem level [1,2]

  • The seasonality of air temperature and net radiation followed a similar trend from winter (i.e., January–March) towards spring (i.e., April–June), peak mer (i.e., July–September), and gradually declined in fall

  • WUE represents a measure of trade-offs between carbon and water fluxes at the ecosystem level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction distributed under the terms andEcosystem water use efficiency (WUE) is expressed as the fraction of carbon gained through gross primary productivity (GPP) to water lost through evapotranspiration (ET)at the ecosystem level [1,2]. Ecosystem water use efficiency (WUE) is expressed as the fraction of carbon gained through gross primary productivity (GPP) to water lost through evapotranspiration (ET). The balance between photosynthesis and ET depends on the leaf functioning regulated by stomatal opening [3]. (e.g., low light intensity, drought), this balance depends on the trade-off between maintaining a high amount of CO2 absorption (benefit) and a low transpiration rate (cost) at the ecosystem scale. Whether or not forested wetlands can regulate WUE over the long run in a drier environment is a question that ecosystem modelers must consider. Studying WUE is important to determine the carbon–water coupling amidst climate change and extreme weather events [4,5]. Multiple-year information about the response of forested wetland ecosystems to global warming and drought is scarce

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call