Abstract
Resumo As cidades têm sido concebidas como um dos principais loci para promoção de mudanças nos padrões de desenvolvimento e na construção de soluções que possam fazer face à complexidade dos problemas públicos contemporâneos. Nesse contexto, o estudo dos ecossistemas de inovação social (EIS) e de seus efeitos nas cidades se coloca como temática relevante, considerando a crise socioambiental e a diversidade e amplitude dos problemas urbanos vivenciados. Trata-se de compreender em que medida os EIS geram consequências diante das problemáticas vividas nas arenas públicas da cidade. Eis o foco deste artigo, que propõe uma abordagem teórico-metodológica, de inspiração pragmatista, para cartografia e análise dos EIS, que se aplica na cidade de Florianópolis. Por meio da co-construção de uma plataforma digital colaborativa, observam-se atores, suas interações e suas práticas, com vistas a compreender “se” e “como” essa rede favorece a “investigação pública” ou a experimentação democrática e/ou promove dinâmicas de desenvolvimento mais sustentáveis na cidade.
Highlights
Cities have been built as one of the main loci for promoting changes in development patterns and building solutions to address the complexity of modern public problems
The demand for an adaptive co-management of local resources (Armitage et al, 2009) emerges in the recent debate on sustainable territorial development (Lévesque, 2009; Vieira, Cazella, Cerdan, & Carrière, 2010), and more in studies that discuss the relationship between cities and sustainability (Angelidou & Psaltoglou, 2017; McPhearson, Andersson, Elmqvist, & Frantzeskaki, 2015)
The analytical-theoretical approach adopted here promotes a dialogue between recent studies on social innovation ecosystems (SIEs) (Alijani et al, 2017; Biggeri et al, 2017; European Commission, 2014; Lévesque, 2016; Pel et al, 2018; Stam, 2015) and the sociology of public problems inspired in pragmatism (Cefaï, 2002, 2014, 2017; Cefaï & Terzi, 2012; Chateauraynaud, 2011; Chateauraynaud & Dubaz, 2017; Dewey, 1927; Quéré & Terzi, 2015)
Summary
The analytical-theoretical approach adopted here promotes a dialogue between recent studies on SIE (Alijani et al, 2017; Biggeri et al, 2017; European Commission, 2014; Lévesque, 2016; Pel et al, 2018; Stam, 2015) and the sociology of public problems inspired in pragmatism (Cefaï, 2002, 2014, 2017; Cefaï & Terzi, 2012; Chateauraynaud, 2011; Chateauraynaud & Dubaz, 2017; Dewey, 1927; Quéré & Terzi, 2015) This dialogue emphasizes aspects that are little considered in the current debate on SIEs, such as the multiscale dynamics of social innovation, its territorial and socio-historical inscription and the connection with public problems and public arenas. The research methodology and its different moments are explained, emphasising the lessons learned throughout the process, offering reflections and considerations for future studies and suggesting new research agendas
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
