Ecophysiological responses of juvenile summer and winter flounder to hypoxia: experimental and modeling analyses of effects on estuarine nursery quality

Abstract

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 325:255-266 (2006) - doi:10.3354/meps325255 Ecophysiological responses of juvenile summer and winter flounder to hypoxia: experimental and modeling analyses of effects on estuarine nursery quality Kevin L. Stierhoff1,2, Timothy E. Targett1,*, KerriLynn Miller1,3 1University of Delaware, College of Marine and Earth Studies, Lewes, Delaware 19958, USA 2Present address: NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Ecology Division, 110 Shaffer Rd, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA 3Present address: Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Box 90328 Duke University, Levine Science Research Center, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA *Corresponding author. Email: ttargett@udel.edu ABSTRACT: Growth and feeding rates were measured in juvenile summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus and winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus exposed to sub-lethal hypoxia (low dissolved oxygen, DO) over a range of temperatures, to determine its potential effects on nursery habitat quality for these 2 estuary-dependent flatfishes. Growth rates of both species were generally reduced as DO decreased, particularly at DO levels of 50 to 70% air saturation, and as temperature increased. Summer flounder were more tolerant of low DO than were winter flounder at both 20 and 25°C. At these temperatures, summer flounder growth was reduced by ~25% (compared to growth at normoxia [7.0 mg O2 l–1]) at 3.5 mg O2 l–1 and by 50 to 60% at 2.0 mg O2 l–1. In contrast, growth of winter flounder at 20°C was reduced by ~50% at both 3.5 and 5.0 mg O2 l–1, and growth was zero at 2.0 mg O2 l–1. At 25°C, winter flounder grew poorly in all DO treatments and lost weight at 2.0 mg O2 l–1. Summer flounder were also tested at 30°C. Growth was significantly reduced even at 5.0 mg O2 l–1, and was reduced by ~90% at 2.0 mg O2 l–1. A significant relationship between feeding rate and growth suggested reduced consumption to be a major cause of growth limitation under hypoxia. There was no evidence of growth acclimation for either species after 7 to 14 d exposure to hypoxia. The effect of hypoxia on growth of summer flounder was reduced at lower salinity (15 vs. 25‰) and was unaffected by the presence of a sand substrate. Similarity between modeled growth under hypoxic conditions, based on our laboratory results, and observed growth of summer flounder in a hypoxic estuarine tributary suggests growth limitation in the wild. These laboratory and field results demonstrate that even moderate hypoxia can adversely affect growth rates, and thus the quality of estuarine nursery habitats for juvenile flatfishes. KEY WORDS: Hypoxia · Summer flounder · Winter flounder · Flatfish · Essential fish habitat · Nursery habitat · Growth limitation Full text in pdf format PreviousNextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 325. Online publication date: November 07, 2006 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research.