Economics of trauma in a small academic medical center.

Abstract

The recent changes in the mechanisms of health care funding have complicated trauma care and trauma center development. Hard data are needed on the current financial position of trauma care to plan for the future. To reduce the cost of trauma care without sacrificing the quality, we must know how the trauma dollar is spent. We reviewed the records of 100 random admissions to the trauma service of our institution in 1985. The records were examined for length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), total hospital bill, types of third-party coverage, and overall collection rate. The hospital bill was broken down to identify the origins of trauma costs. To provide a control group, 100 patients admitted to the general surgical service and 100 other admissions were also analyzed. Trauma patients had greater LOS, ICU-LOS, total bills, and costs per day. Blunt trauma resulted in a greater LOS than penetrating trauma, but similar total bills. The collection rate from the blunt trauma patients was significantly greater. The greatest differences between trauma patients and others in resource utilization are the result of longer ICU-LOS and greater use of blood products. We did not identify any sites of potentially significant cost cutting that would not compromise patient care.