Abstract
We undertake economic modeling of the behavior of participants in blockchain-based securities settlement implemented through hashed timelock contracts (HTLCs). HTLCs have been noted to have the problem of failure when one of the participants attempted to void the transaction by making a late signature. We propose that the premium should be paid by a structurally favorable participant and show that failure due to late signatures rarely occurs according to the utilities of the participants after the introduction of the premium theoretically. Then we conduct quantitative analysis using KRX bond settlement data and show that the proposed method provides better settlement results than the benchmark model. In particular, our results help regulator or policy makers consider fintechs in their regulatory and policy decisions without significantly departing from their original framework.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
