Abstract
For writing economic history, standard theory is found to be excessively a priori and prone to assume away interesting phenomena. A particular defect is the lack of a mainstream theory of institutional change. Yet market analysis, although sometimes used unwisely as a substitute for historical description, does offer a standard of comparison which is absent from general history. The simpler concepts of economics also offer returns which the historian can scarcely afford to spurn.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have